URAA Architecture
The protocol employs a five-layer architecture. Each layer corresponds to a core functional domain of living systems, coupled only through standardized inter-layer interfaces:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ L4: Collective Immunity Layer │ ← Species Memory│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐││ │ L3: Competition & Exchange Layer ││ ← Selection & Transfer│ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│││ │ │ L2: Calibration Layer │││ ← Immune System│ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐││││ │ │ │ L1: Synthesis Layer ││││ ← Protein Synthesis│ │ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐│││││ │ │ │ │ L0: Kernel Layer │││││ ← Genetic Code│ │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────┘│││││ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘││││ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│││ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘│└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘L0: Kernel Layer — Genetic Code
Section titled “L0: Kernel Layer — Genetic Code”The kernel is the agent’s root of trust, implemented by a Trust Anchor that enforces immutable security constraints. This is the only layer that does not participate in evolution.
- Constraint Enforcement: The trust anchor enforces an immutable constraint set; no gene execution may violate these constraints.
- State Anchoring: Core agent state is compressed to a fixed-size state digest and persisted tamper-proof.
- Permission Isolation: Gene execution occurs in isolated permission domains — genes cannot access each other’s state or resources.
| Trust Backend | Technology Examples | Applicable Scenarios |
|---|---|---|
| Distributed Ledger | Smart Contracts (EVM/Move/WASM) | Decentralized permissionless networks |
| Trusted Execution Environment | Intel TDX / ARM TrustZone / AWS Nitro | Enterprise high-performance |
| Cryptographic Signature Chain | Signed manifests + PKI | Lightweight controlled networks |
| Hardware Security Module | HSM / TPM | IoT and embedded devices |
L1: Synthesis Layer — Protein Synthesis
Section titled “L1: Synthesis Layer — Protein Synthesis”The protocol’s “ribosome” — transforms unstructured raw data into standardized gene fragments.
The core is the Synthesizer abstract interface:
interface Synthesizer { function synthesize(source: RawSource, targetSpec: RotiferGeneSpec) -> Gene function mutate(gene: Gene, mutationRate: Float) -> Gene function crossover(geneA: Gene, geneB: Gene) -> Gene}Multiple implementations are possible: LLM-based, template engines, deterministic rule transformers, manual authoring, or hybrid routers. The core protocol does not depend on any specific AI capability.
L2: Calibration Layer — Immune System
Section titled “L2: Calibration Layer — Immune System”Emulates biological “thymic selection”: newly synthesized or externally acquired genes must pass multi-stage validation in an isolated environment before entering an agent’s main execution sequence.
Three-stage screening: Static Analysis → Sandbox Simulation → Controlled Live Trial (< 5% agent subset, 72h observation).
L3: Competition & Exchange Layer — Selection & Transfer
Section titled “L3: Competition & Exchange Layer — Selection & Transfer”Combines two complementary mechanisms:
- Arena (Selection Pressure): Genes in the same functional domain compete by real-world fitness
F(g). Agents preferentially express top-ranked genes. Dynamic hot-loading enables runtime replacement without restart. - Horizontal Logic Transfer (Gene Flow): High-fitness gene metadata propagates via P2P. Agents pull full genes based on their own “phenotypic needs” (capability gaps).
L4: Collective Immunity Layer — Species Memory
Section titled “L4: Collective Immunity Layer — Species Memory”Network-wide “collective memory” recording security incidents, malicious gene fingerprints, and defense strategies. Threat broadcasting, defense sharing, temporal decay, and consensus-verified write operations.